Atypical fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva diagnosed by whole‐exome sequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by congenital malformations of the great toes and progressive heterotopic ossification of connective tissue that begins during the first decade of life. Our patient presented with intrauterine growth retardation, respiratory distress, neonatal onset soft tissue masses, bilateral hallux valgus, and congenital anomalies of the thyroid and uterus. She was initially diagnosed with atypical infantile myofibromatosis based on clinical and pathological findings. She underwent whole-exome sequencing (WES) as part of the FORGE study to identify the gene for infantile myofibromatosis; however a de novo dominant mutation in ACVR1 (NM_001105.4:c.617G>A) revised the diagnosis to FOP. This patient highlights the utility of WES as an early diagnostic tool in the investigation of patients with unusual presentations of rare diseases, thereby providing clinicians with accurate molecular diagnoses and the opportunity to tailor clinical management to improve patient care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".