Elastin Gene Deletions in Williams Syndrome Patients Result in Altered Deposition of Elastic Fibers in Skin and a Subclinical Dermal Phenotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Williams syndrome (WS) is a complex developmental disorder with multisystem involvement known to be the result of a microdeletion in the q11.23 region of chromosome 7. This deletion involves several genes, including the elastin gene. Although elastic fibers are important constituents of skin, little is known about the skin phenotype in WS patients. We have therefore studied the skin of four WS patients in which we've shown the deletion of one copy of the elastin gene. Physical examination and indirect immunofluorescent microscopy of elastin did not detect any major phenotypic or morphologic changes in the skin. We were able, however, to show subtle textural changes in skin and, by electron microscopy, that the amorphous component of elastic fibers in WS patients was consistently reduced when compared to normal controls. These findings indicate that deletion of one copy of the elastin gene results in reduced deposition of elastin in dermal elastic fibers, an altered elastic fiber ultrastructure, and a subclinical dermal phenotype in the children and young adult patients analyzed in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".