MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065257155 · doi:10.1063/1.1518683

A revised experimental absolute magnetic shielding scale for oxygen

2002· article· en· W2065257155 on OpenAlexafffund
Roderick E. Wasylishen, David L. Bryce

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsElectromagnetic shieldingOxygenChemistryIsotropyCarbon monoxideMonoxideAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Ab initioConstant (computer programming)Ab initio quantum chemistry methodsAbsolute scaleAtomic physicsNuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials sciencePhysicsMoleculeInorganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A revised absolute magnetic shielding scale for oxygen is established based on a recently reported highly precise experimental measurement of the O17 spin-rotation constant in carbon monoxide. The isotropic oxygen magnetic shielding constant for C12O17 at the equilibrium geometry, σe, is found to be −56.8±0.6 ppm. The experimental rovibrationally averaged value of the shielding constant at 300 K, 〈σ〉300 K, is −62.7±0.6 ppm, in excellent agreement with the ab initio value reported by Vaara et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 109, 8388 (1998)]. Based on the revised scale and on experimentally known oxygen chemical shifts, 〈σ〉300 K (H2O(l)) is 287.5±0.6 ppm and 〈σ〉300 K (H2O(g)) is 323.6±0.6 ppm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations116
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207