Ocular Oscillations and Transient Oscillopsia in Neuromyelitis Optica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a chronic relapsing and disabling disease. It typically causes inflammatory destruction of optic nerve as well as spinal cord that ultimately leads to blindness and paraplegia, respectively. It is more commonly seen in females who are in late thirties and seropositive for anti-NMO-IgG autoantibodies. Ocular movement disorders form an important clinical sign of multiple sclerosis (MS). They are less commonly described in NMO and represent an overt or an occult pathology of brainstem. These ocular movement disturbances generally improve with treatment. However, oscillopsia, with or without nystagmus, is a less reported symptom of NMO that appears early during the course of disease. We are reporting a patient in whom the diagnosis of NMO was made only after the full evolution of the disease, because of the misconception that a closer association exists between MS and optic neuritis and nystagmus. Oscillopsia manifested late during the relapse in this case and disappeared on disease remission although nystagmus persisted throughout the course of disease. We recommend that in patients having nystagmus and optic neuritis a possibility of NMO must be kept in mind. J Neurol Res. 2014;4(5-6):146-150 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jnr308e
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".