Low temperature aluminum nitride deposition on aluminum by rf reactive sputtering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thin film bulk acoustic resonators formed by sputter deposition of piezoelectric films of aluminum nitride on silicon substrates offer an attractive approach to monolithic integration of high Q passive circuit elements with active devices. Such resonators could provide low cost, high performance filters for the steadily growing number of consumer wireless communication devices. Fabrication of these resonators requires a well-characterized low temperature deposition process for aluminum nitride. This material has been studied for use in sensors and actuators, as well as acoustic wave devices. Radio frequency reactive magnetron sputtering produces high quality films, and provides reasonable deposition rates for fabricating high frequency resonators. This work describes aluminum nitride films deposited by radio frequency reactive magnetron sputtering with power varied from 2 to 6 W/cm2, pressure from 0.5 to 1.5 Pa, and N2 flow from 50% to 100% of the total flow. Measured results include x-ray diffraction spectra and measurements of piezoelectric coefficients. X-ray diffraction measurements indicate highly (002) c-axis oriented films. Piezoelectric coefficients e31 were measured by depositing aluminum nitride capacitors on silicon beams and measuring charge generation as each beam was deflected a known distance. Film quality was found to depend strongly on deposition power, with a smaller dependence on pressure and gas mixture. Deposition at higher pressures is preferred for resonator fabrication due to reduction in stress when compared with low pressure deposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it