Acute regulation of hepatic lipase secretion by rat hepatocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hepatic lipase is involved in cholesterol uptake by the liver. Although it is known that catecholamines are responsible for the daily variation of enzyme activity, the mechanisms involved are poorly understood. Rat hepatocytes incubated with adrenaline or other Ca(2+)-mobilizing hormones were used as an experimental model. Adrenaline reduced in a similar proportion the secretion of both hepatic lipase and albumin. The effect of adrenaline disappeared completely in cells exposed to cycloheximide. Adrenaline decreased incorporation of [35S]Met into cellular and secreted proteins, but it affected neither degradation of [35S]Met-prelabeled proteins nor the abundance of total and specific (albumin, hepatic lipase, beta-actin) mRNA. Other Ca(2+)-mobilizing agents had the opposite effect on hepatic lipase secretion: it was decreased by vasopressin but was increased by epidermal growth factor. Vasopressin and epidermal growth factor had the opposite effect on [35S]Met incorporation into cellular and secreted proteins, but neither affected hepatic lipase mRNA. The acute effect of adrenaline, vasopressin, and epidermal growth factor on hepatic lipase secretion is the consequence of the effect of these hormones on protein synthesis and is therefore nonspecific.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".