MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065296649 · doi:10.1002/cjce.20457

Density functional modelling in multiphase compositional hydrodynamics

2010· article· en· W2065296649 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. Yu. Demianov, O. Yu. Dinariev, Nikolay Evseev

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAquatic and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHelmholtz free energyConservation lawStatistical physicsMixture theoryWork (physics)Entropy (arrow of time)Momentum (technical analysis)Classical mechanicsThermodynamicsMathematicsMechanicsPhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This work is essentially a review of a density functional approach in multiphase hydrodynamics developed by the authors during the last 15 years [Dinariev, J Appl Math Mech 1995;59(5):745–752; Dinariev, J Appl Math Mech 1998;62(3):397–405; Demyanov and Dinariev, Fluid Dynam 2004;39(6):933–944; Demianov et al., “Basics of the Density Functional Theory in Hydrodynamics,” Fizmatlit, Moscow; 2009 (in Russian); Dinariev and Evseev, Fluid Dynam 2010;45(1):85–95]. The basic assumption is a representation of the entropy or the Helmholtz energy of the mixture as a functional that is dependent upon chemical component densities. The hydrodynamic system of equations (local conservation laws for chemical components, momentum, and energy) is used to describe multiphase processes, and the constitutive relations (expressions for stresses, diffusion, and heat fluxes) are derived from entropy growth requirement. The authors present the results of numerical simulations describing static and dynamic multiphase systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.146
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAquatic and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207