MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065316076 · doi:10.1071/rdv24n1ab87

87 BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD: IN VITRO CULTURE OF BOVINE EMBRYOS FOR FREEZING

2011· article· en· W2065316076 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Vigneault, S.L. Underwood, Valérie Fournier, D. Bousquet, Josée Belanger, Patrick Blondin

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbryo cultureBlastocystBiologyReproductive technologyTheriogenologyEmbryoEmbryo qualityAndrologyFertilisationCryopreservationBiotechnologyIn vitro fertilisationEmbryogenesisCell biologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite hundreds of scientific papers published, no system has resulted in in vitro embryos comparable to those produced in vivo. We hypothesised that assembling the most pertinent elements of IVF studies into one system would result in a highly efficient in vitro culture system. Here we report the in vitro production of bovine embryos using a culture system with strict environmental conditions that produces very-good-quality embryos at high rates. This system consists of a sequential culture system with media composition based on recent reports that characterise the bovine female reproductive tract (Hugentobler et al. 2007 Mol. Reprod. Dev.74, 445–454; Hugentobler et al. 2007 Theriogenology68, 538–548; Hugentobler et al. 2008 Mol. Reprod. Dev.75, 496–503). This system uses a 3-step culture media to prevent toxicity resulting from ammonium accumulation and nutrient depletion and also to adjust the component concentrations to support embryo needs at different developmental stages. Fatty acid-free BSA is used as the protein source and the culture is in droplets under high-quality paraffin oil at 38.5°C under 6.8% CO2, 5% O2 and 88.2% N2. Numerous other aspects were investigated to limit embryo stresses (Lane et al. 2008 Reprod. Fertil. Dev.20, 23–32) during manipulations, including the use of mini-incubators and very-high-purity gas combined with stringent laboratory practices. In the first year using this new embryo production system, 2839 oocytes were fertilized, resulting in a transferable blastocyst rate of 51%. Of the 1448 embryos produced, 779 were transferred fresh at our facility with pregnancy rates of 55 and 49% at 28 and 60 days, respectively. Pregnancy rates were directly related to the quality of the embryos transferred as 61% of grade 1 embryos transferred induced a pregnancy at Day 28, compared with 41% of grade 2 embryos. Pregnancy induction is not the only indication of good embryo quality. As is well-documented, in vitro-produced bovine embryos do not tolerate slow freezing, so vitrification was applied to surmount this intolerance. However, this is difficult to apply to industry because direct transfer of vitrified embryos is challenging. We hypothesised that the improvement of embryo culture would result in embryos that could tolerate slow freezing. Grade 1 blastocysts (n = 229) were frozen in 1.6M ethylene glycol and 0.1 M sucrose using standard slow freezing procedures. A very high proportion (91%) of frozen–thawed in vitro-produced embryos re-expanded after 24 h of culture with a good quality inner cell mass. Subsequently, 45 grade 1 blastocysts were frozen and transferred, giving pregnancy rates of 58% at Day 60. In conclusion, combining good-quality culture media and conditions resulted in the production of in vitro embryos that were very efficient at inducing pregnancies and tolerating slow freezing, which makes it now possible to consider direct transfer of frozen in vitro-produced bovine embryos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207