MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065345886 · doi:10.1088/0268-1242/29/8/085002

Electrical characterization of in-place bonded interfaces

2014· article· en· W2065345886 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSemiconductor Science and Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of VictoriaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharacterization (materials science)Materials scienceNanotechnologyChemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wafer bonding using an intermediate layer such as SiO2 is now a standard method for the fabrication of engineered substrates in the semiconductor industry, the prime example being silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrates. However, direct semiconductor-to-semiconductor bonding by this method has been less successful, since the surfaces to be bonded are typically exposed to air. With the in-place bonding method, semiconductor-to-semiconductor bonding occurs during removal of a sacrificial layer in an HF solution, in principle allowing for a bonded interface that is free of oxygen and other airborn contaminants. We have investigated the interface properties of in-place bonded GaAs/GaAs structures with both transmission electron microscopy and current–voltage measurements. The interface was found to be free of an oxide interlayer and microstructure imperfections. The specific electrical resistance is (2.2 ± 0.5) × 10−4 Ω cm2, an order of magnitude lower than values reported for wafer bonded interfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it