Influence of host and pathogen variables on the efficacy <i>of Phoma herbarum</i>, a potential biological control agent of <i>Taraxacum officinale</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phoma herbarum Westendorp has been identified as a potential biological weed control agent (BWCA) for Taraxacum officinale Weber in turf. However, host and pathogen variables that influence the efficacy of this BWCA need to be identified to provide more optimal conditions for production and efficacy. In controlled-environment studies, 4-week-old T. officinale plants were significantly more susceptible to P. herbarum than were plants that were 6 and 8 weeks old, nonflowering but mature, budding, or flowering. Mycelial suspensions incited significantly more severe disease than conidia, and 5-day-old mycelial shake cultures incited significantly higher disease than 3-, 7-, 9-, 11-, or 13-day-old cultures. A concentration of 10 to 20% of mycelial fragments in potato dextrose broth (v/v) incited higher disease severity than 0, 40, 60, or 100%. These experiments identified several important host and pathogen variables that influence the efficacy of P. herbarum on T. officinale and established more optimal conditions for production and efficacy of this BWCA.Key words: biological weed control, bioherbicide, mycoherbicide, Taraxacum officinale, dandelion, Phoma herbarum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".