Prolonged Remission in SLE Revisited: An Old Wine in a New Bottle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To achieve sustained remission is the ultimate goal of any maintenance treatment used in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) — as well as the dream of any clinician in charge of patients with SLE. While in other autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, it is easier to identify which patients achieved remission or low disease activity levels, the concept of remission is more difficult to define and harder to achieve in SLE, owing to the heterogeneity of this condition, the multiple organs affected, and the many activity scores used. In this issue of The Journal , Steiman, et al 1, from the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic, interestingly revisit the concept of sustained and prolonged remission in patients with SLE followed between 1970 and 2011 using a standardized protocol at clinic visits. The authors conducted a study focused on prolonged clinical remission (clinically quiescent), with or without serological activity, in a cohort including more than 1600 SLE patients with a very long followup (mean disease duration, 21 yrs). Of interest, only around 2% of patients achieved prolonged (at least 5 yrs) clinical remission, without any underlying immunosuppressive drug (except for antimalarials). An additional subset of patients who achieved remission while taking medical treatment are described. The authors used very strict definition criteria for serologically and clinically quiescent disease: at least a 5-year period without evidence of clinical activity [SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) = 0]. Clinically quiescent but serologically active disease allowed SLEDAI-2K scores ≤ 4, positive anti-dsDNA antibody and/or hypocomplementemia only. Patients with prolonged remission had a lower burden of disease activity and disease damage. Further, the authors made an attempt to identify predictors of prolonged remission. Interestingly, regression models revealed that patients with late disease onset and those with less skin disease were more likely to achieve … Address correspondence to Dr. Gómez-Puerta, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, PBB-B3; Section of Clinical Sciences, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 221 Longwood Ave., 3rd floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. E-mail: jgomezpuerta{at}mail.harvard.edu
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.022 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.032 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".