Investigation of Mercury Transformation by HBr Addition in a Slipstream Facility with Real Flue Gas Atmospheres of Bituminous Coal and Powder River Basin Coal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An investigation of speciated mercury transformation with the addition of hydrogen bromide (HBr) at elevated temperatures was conducted in a slipstream reactor with real flue gas atmospheres. A real flue gas atmosphere is composed of bituminous coal (with high sulfur and high chlorine contents) and Powder River Basin (PRB) coal (with lower sulfur and chlorine contents). The average sulfur, chlorine, and mercury contents in the tested bituminous coal were 1.31% and 1328 and 0.11 ppm and 0.61% and 170 and 0.08 ppm, respectively, for tested PRB coal. The average CaO, Fe 2 O 3, and loss on ignition in collected fly ash contents of tested bituminous coal were 1.71, 17.51, and 7.13% and 22.95, 4.91, and 0.64%, respectively, for tested PRB coal. The different contents of coal chlorine, CaO, and Fe 2 O 3 in fly ash can be attributed to the different mercury speciations at baseline tests for these two coals in this study. The addition of HBr concentrations into the flue gas was controlled in the 3−15 ppm range. Semi-continuous mercury emission monitors were used to check the variation of mercury speciation at sampling locations. The Ontario Hydro Method (ASTM D6784-02) was used for data validation or comparison. For both methods, a high temperature inertial sampling probe was used to minimize the interference between vapor phase mercury and fly ash. Its temperatures were controlled consistently with flue gas temperatures at their installation locations in the slipstream reactor. Test results indicated that adding HBr into the flue gas at several parts per million strongly impacted the mercury oxidation and adsorption, which were dependent upon temperature ranges. Higher temperatures (in the range of 300−350 °C) promoted mercury oxidation by HBr addition but did not promote mercury adsorption. Lower temperatures (in a range of 150−200 °C) enhanced mercury adsorption on the fly ash by adding HBr. Test results also verified effects of flue gas atmospheres on the mercury oxidation by the addition of HBr, which included concentrations of chlorine and sulfur in the flue gas. Chlorine species seemed to be involved in the competition with bromine species in the mercury oxidation process. With the addition of HBr at 3 ppm at a temperature of about 330 °C, the additional mercury oxidation could be reached by about 55% in a flue gas atmosphere by burning PRB coal in the flue gas and by about 20% in a flue gas by burning bituminous coal. These are both greater than the maximum gaseous HgBr 2 percentage in the flue gas (35% for PRB coal and 5% for bituminous coal) by thermodynamic equilibrium analysis predictions under the same conditions. This disagreement may indicate a greater complexity of mercury oxidation mechanisms by the addition of HBr. It is possible that bromine species promote activated chlorine species generation in the flue gas, where the kinetics of elemental mercury oxidation were enhanced. However, SO 2 in the flue gas may involve the consumption of the available activated chlorine species. Thus, the higher mercury oxidation rate by adding bromine under the flue gas by burning PRB coal may be associated with its lower SO 2 concentration in the flue gas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".