MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065422153 · doi:10.4141/p05-094

Lodging increases severity and impact of mycosphaerella blight on field pea

2006· article· en· W2065422153 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
T. F. Wang, B. D. Gossen, A. E. Slinkard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetic and Environmental Crop Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersSaskatchewan Pulse GrowersMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsFungicideMycosphaerellaBlightSativumBiologyAgronomyCultivarAscochytaMycosphaerella graminicolaField peaYield (engineering)Horticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mycosphaerella blight, caused by Mycosphaerella pinodes, is a serious disease of pea (Pisum sativum) world-wide. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of lodging (reduced lodging treatment vs. control) and foliar fungicide (three to four applications of chlorothalonil vs. control) on the severity of mycosphaerella blight, and on seed yield and 1000-seed weight of 10 pea genotypes (three adapted cultivars and seven genotypes with partial resistance). In the reduced lodging treatment, a wire mesh was secured 30 cm above the ground; the crop was allowed to grow up through the mesh and be supported by it. The study was conducted under irrigation at two locations in Saskatchewan for 2 yr. Blight severity on stems, foliage, and pods was rated three to four times per year. The reduced-lodging treatment and application of fungicide reduced blight severity and increased seed yield and 1000-seed weight. The effects of reduced lodging and fungicide application were additive. Overall, lodging was associated with the largest reductions in seed yield and seed weight, but the impact of fungicide application was slightly larger than that of lodging for the three commercial cultivars. We conclude that losses caused by mycosphaerella blight may be reduced by breeding for improved resistance to lodging, but that application of foliar fungicide and breeding for partial resistance also hold promise. Key words: Pisum sativum, Mycosphaerella pinodes, resistance, fungicide, yield loss, quality

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2006
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicGenetic and Environmental Crop StudiesFrench-language works237,207