A new geological framework for the Middle Ordovician Carillon Formation (uppermost Beekmantown Group, Ottawa Embayment): onset of Taconic foreland deposition and tectonism within the Laurentian platform interior
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Carillon Formation underlies the Ottawa Embayment, a craton-interior extension of the regional Laurentian paleoshelf, defined today by the Ottawa–Bonnechere Graben. Facies within the embayment during the Middle Ordovician identify a mixed-sediment (carbonate, siliciclastic), tide-influenced, peritidal and schizohaline basin, host to a mosaic of dolomitic tidal mudflats, shallow lagoons or ponds, and channels. Skeletal metazoans were rare, but bioturbation increased with episodic influx of less saline water carrying sand and mud, possibly in response to regional climate change. Stratigraphic analysis reveals that the formation coincides with a third-order eustatic sea level cycle, but higher order stratigraphic patterns show no obvious eustatic link. Instead, a stepwise onlap geometry coincided with local faulting that produced widespread syndepositional sediment deformation. In particular, stages of faulting and post-Carillon erosion are mapped along the present-day trace of a northwest–southeast-oriented lineament, the Gloucester Fault, within the present graben. Other present-day northwest–southeast-oriented faults of the graben may also possess Middle Ordovician histories. Platform-interior tectonism and development of the Carillon Formation coincided with the onset of Taconic deformation along the outer paleoshelf (western Newfoundland). The formation defines the initial stage of foreland basin sedimentation in the embayment. Platform-interior faulting identifies a predisposed structural weakness associated with underlying Neoproterozoic structure, possibly enhanced by a regional structural connection (an ocean-to-onland transform fault system) with the distal (~1200 km), convergent, plate boundary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".