Synthesis, cure kinetics, and thermal properties of the Bis(3‐allyl‐2‐cyanatophenyl)sulphoxide/BMI blends
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A novel allyl functionalized dicyanate ester resin bearing sulfoxide linkage was synthesized. The monomer was characterized by Fourier Transform Infrared (FT‐IR) Spectroscopy, 1 H‐, and 13 C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The monomer was blended with bismaleimide (BMI) at various ratios in the absence of catalyst. The cure kinetics of one of the blends was studied using differential scanning calorimetry [nonisothermal] and the kinetic parameters like activation energy ( E ), pre‐exponential factor ( A ), and the order of the reaction ( n ) were calculated by Coats‐Redfern method and compared with those calculated using the experimental Borchardt‐Daniels method. The thermal stability of the cured dicyanate, BMI, and the blends was studied using thermogravimetric analyzer. The initial weight loss temperature of dicyanate ester is above 380°C with char yield of about 54% at 800°C. Thermal degradation of BMI starts above 463°C with the char yield of about 68%. Inclusion of BMI in cyanate ester increases the thermal stability from 419 to 441°C. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".