MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2065502111 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m300604200

Mechanisms for the Formation of Isoprostane Endoperoxides from Arachidonic Acid

2003· article· en· W2065502111 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Huiyong Yin, Christine M. Havrilla, Ling Gao, Jason D. Morrow, Ned A. Porter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of ChemistryNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Science FoundationNational Institutes of HealthVanderbilt University
KeywordsAutoxidationChemistryIsoprostanesArachidonic acidIsoprostaneDioxetaneFragmentation (computing)StereochemistryOxidative stressOrganic chemistryBiochemistryLipid peroxidationChemiluminescenceEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The isoprostanes are a class of autoxidation products generated from arachidonic acid (or its esters) by a free radical initiated process. The potent biological activity of these compounds has been attracting intense research interest since they were detected in humans as well as animal models in the early 1990s. The measurement of these compounds has been regarded as one of the most useful non-invasive biomarkers for oxidative stress status. Two mechanisms for the formation of these compounds have been proposed. In the first mechanism, a peroxyl radical undergoes successive 5-exo cyclizations analogous to the enzymatic mechanism proposed for prostaglandin biosynthesis. The second mechanism starts with a 4-exo cyclization of a peroxyl radical leading to an intermediate dioxetane, a mechanism that has also been proposed for prostaglandin biosynthesis as well as for the formation of 4-hydroxy nonenal (HNE). Autoxidation of cholesteryl-15-HpETE under free radical conditions provides Type IV isoprostanes. The "dioxetane" mechanism for isoprostane generation from 15-HpETE requires that optically pure products are formed from an optically pure reactant, whereas an alternate mechanism for the process involving beta-fragmentation of the 15-peroxyl would give racemic isoprostane products. We have carried out a test of the mechanism based upon these stereochemical requirements. The results of analysis of the product mixture derived from autoxidation of optically pure Ch-15-HpETE by atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry coupled with chiral high performance liquid chromatography indicate that the major isoprostane diastereomers are formed as a racemic mixture. These experimental results are consistent with a mechanism for isoprostane formation involving beta-fragmentation of the 15-peroxyl radical followed by re-addition of oxygen to form the 11-HPETE peroxyl, and they exclude a mechanism proceeding through the formation of a dioxetane intermediate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological Chemistry→Same topicFree Radicals and Antioxidants→French-language works237,207→