Motor unit number estimation by decomposition‐enhanced spike‐triggered averaging: Control data, test–retest reliability, and contractile level effects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Decomposition-enhanced spike-triggered averaging (DE-STA) has been developed as a method for obtaining a motor unit number estimate (MUNE). We describe the method and report control data for the first dorsal interosseous/adductor pollicis and thenar muscles and reliability in the thenar muscles. Seventeen subjects (ages 20-50 years) took part in the study. The maximum M potential was elicited with supramaximal stimulation of the ulnar or median nerve at the wrist. Surface and intramuscularly detected electromyographic signals were then collected simultaneously during mild to moderate contractions. Decomposition algorithms were used to detect and sort the individual motor unit potential (MUP) occurrences of several concurrently active motor units in the needle-detected signals. The MUP occurrences were used as triggering sources to estimate their corresponding surface-detected MUPs (S-MUPs) using STA. The mean S-MUP size was calculated and divided into the maximum M-potential size to derive a MUNE. The MUNE values were consistent with those previously reported with other methods, and thenar MUNEs for the two trials were similar (249 +/- 78 and 246 +/- 90), with high test-retest reliability (r = 0.94, P < 0.05). DE-STA thus appears to be a valid and reliable method to obtain MUNEs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it