Declining fecundity and factors affecting embryo quality in the American lobster (<i>Homarus americanus</i>) from the Bay of Fundy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent perturbations in ecosystem and environmental dynamics in the habitat of the American lobster have led to increases in abundance, with unprecedented high landings in some regions. Despite the commercial value of this species, surprisingly little is known about maternal and environmental influences on its reproductive output. We measured fecundity and embryo quality in 1370 ovigerous lobsters from the Bay of Fundy, Canada, during 2008–2013. Female size was generally positively correlated with fecundity (P < 0.001), although some of the very large (and presumably old) females brooded significantly fewer eggs than expected. Egg energy content and lipid content and composition exhibited significant annual differences, indicating environmentally based variation. The most striking difference was a 31% decline in fecundity from 2008 to 2013 (8%–10% per year). We hypothesize that recent warming trends could be responsible for reduced fecundity. Decreased fecundity may be a cause for concern for future recruitment in this population, which has been shown to be an important source of larvae for the Gulf of Maine metapopulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".