Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a novel approach for the synthesis of zeolite Y is described. The effect of varying the starting silica source on the purity of zeolite Y was investigated, while all other reaction parameters were kept constant. The purity of zeolite was expressed in terms of percent crystallinity obtained from the powder XRD. The silica sources were all powders of varying types (except for silica sol). To study the influence of the varying silica sources on the purity of the resulting zeolite Y, the best gel composition and synthesis condition for one batch were chosen. The gel composition was 4Na 2 O:1Al 2 O 3:6SiO 2:200H 2 O. The aging temperature and duration of aging were chosen as room temperature and 120 h, respectively. The synthesis temperature and synthesis time were 100 °C and 48 h. The experiments were all conducted in sealed 30 mL Teflon bottles. The extent to which the pure zeolite Y was formed depended on the BET specific surface area of the silica sources (ranging from 150 to 300 m 2 /g) but not on the synthesis conditions. This novel method for zeolite Y preparation allows one to eliminate the vigorous agitation step required for the preparation of a homogeneous silica solution, thereby simplifying the synthesis of zeolite Y in one single vessel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".