MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065579584 · doi:10.1159/000166782

The Various Renal Manifestations of the Nephropathic Form of Cystinosis

2008· article· en· W2065579584 on OpenAlexaff
Jacques Lemire, Bernard S. Kaplan

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Nephrology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Research and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFanconi syndromeCystinosisNephrogenic diabetes insipidusTubulopathyHypoaldosteronismMetabolic acidosisHyperkalemiaBartter syndromeHyponatremiaInternal medicinePediatricsRenal tubular acidosisDistal renal tubular acidosisEndocrinologyDiabetes insipidusAcidosisKidney diseaseKidneyHypokalemiaBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three phenotypic forms of cystinosis (nephropathic, juvenile-onset and benign adult forms) are well recognized. That not all infants and children have the classical nephropathic form with Fanconi's syndrome is illustrated by 2 of the 3 patients in this report. Case 1 had the typical nephropathic form with generalized proximal tubular dysfunction. In contrast, case 2 had transient features of Bartter's syndrome which preceded the manifestations of Fanconi's syndrome. Case 3 was more complex because he first presented with a syndrome of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. He then developed features of Fanconi's syndrome as well as metabolic acidosis, hyponatremia and hyperkalemia. The failure of deoxycorticosteroid administration to elevate the serum concentration suggested, in retrospect, that he may also have had a form of acquired pseudohypoaldosteronism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NephrologySame topicBiomedical Research and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207