MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2065669946 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.1054

P2‐345: Early‐onset dementia: Needs of patients and carers in the early diagnostic stage

2012· article· en· W2065669946 on OpenAlexaff
Theresa Green, Eric E. Smith, David B. Hogan, Dawn Pearson, Pamela Roach

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaFocus groupDemographicsQualitative researchMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)GerontologyQualitative propertyPsychologyNursingDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the prevalence, incidence and burden of illness for patients and carers in late onset dementia (LOD; >65 years of age) has been well-studied for over 40 years, these are less well known in early onset dementia (EOD; dementia occurring in the under 65 years of age group). Caregivers of individuals with EOD are likely to be working at the time of dementia diagnosis, and more than half may need to reduce their hours or stop working due to their caregiving role. However, in most cities and countries, services for patients with dementia are based on the identified needs of the over 65 years of age group and their caregivers. To develop services for younger people with dementia and their caregivers, it is important to define the needs of service users according to age, activity and social relations. We are conducting a comparative mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) study to explore the characteristics and support needs of patients and carers with EOD and LOD. Survey data including demographics, quality of life and caregiver burden are collected from patients and carers. Audio-taped interviews are conducted with data transcribed, uploaded to the computer program NVIVO 9 and analyzed for codes and interrelated themes. Qualitative findings will be corroborated through focus group interviews with EOD and LOD caregivers. The mixed methodology allows detailed understanding of EOD patients and carer needs. Qualitative interviews have been completed with 7 EOD couples. Shortly following EOD diagnosis significant changes occur in caregivers' work, social and personal life; reduced quality of life, loss of independence, loss of intimacy and change in the marital relationship are recurrent themes. Uncertainty, frustration and exhaustion are major emotional sequelae. Lack of support, resources, and guidelines in regards to the patient's present state and future planning were also concerns among caregivers. A roadmap and potentially a consistent navigator' to provide guidance over the first few months in unraveling community services and describing potential dementia progression for patients, caregivers and young family members is critically important in preparing and supporting those living with EOD to maintain quality of life, mood and relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→