Putting flesh on the bones: <scp>DCC</scp> combines membrane insertion with cytoskeletal reorganization to promote chemoattraction (Commentary on Cotrufo <i>et al</i>.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Directional axon extension and cell migration require both cytoskeletal reorganization and membrane insertion to extend the leading edge of a cell. In this issue, Cotrufo et al. (2012) provide evidence that the chemoattractant netrin-1 directs membrane extension during neuronal cell migration by promoting local exocytosis. Netrins are chemotropic guidance cues that direct axon extension, cell migration and neurite branching during neural development (Lai Wing Sun et al., 2011). Signal transduction mechanisms activated by the netrin-1 receptor DCC (Deleted in Colorectal Cancer) regulate cytoskeletal organization, and understanding how chemotropic guidance cues regulate the cytoskeleton has been a major focus of the field. The findings presented by Cotrufo et al. (2012) now fundamentally expand the role of DCC, providing evidence that netrin-1 binding may cause DCC to direct a localized increase in membrane insertion, facilitating the formation of cellular protrusions. Cotrufo et al. (2011) had previously used hippocampal neurons to determine that netrin-1 increases the association between DCC and syntaxin-1, which is a plasma membrane target membrane-Soluble NSF Attachment Protein Receptor (SNARE) with a well-established function in synaptic vesicle exocytosis. In the current study, the authors extend these findings to cell migration using a well-characterized assay of chemotropic neuronal cell migration in the embryonic mammalian brain. During early development, post-mitotic neurons are directed by netrin-1 to migrate from the lower rhombic lip to form the pontine nuclei (Alcantara et al., 2000). The authors provide evidence for a direct interaction between DCC and syntaxin-1 in migrating neurons, and demonstrate that disrupting syntaxin-1 function blocks the chemoattractant migration of these cells to netrin-1. During synaptic vesicle release, syntaxin-1 forms a canonical SNARE complex with SNAP25 (Synaptosomal-associated protein 25), a plasma membrane SNARE, and synaptobrevin, a vesicle-SNARE on synaptic vesicles. Interestingly, disrupting the function of either SNAP25 or synaptobrevin-2 [also called vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP)2] had no effect on netrin-mediated axon guidance (Cotrufo et al., 2011) or cell migration (Cotrufo et al., 2012), suggesting that, if DCC functions with syntaxin-1 to promote exocytosis, this may occur via a novel, and perhaps atypical, complex of SNARE proteins. Along these lines, the authors detect a complex of DCC and the vesicle-SNARE tetanus neurotoxin-insensitive VAMP (also called VAMP7) in migrating cells (Cotrufo et al., 2012) and have shown that disrupting tetanus neurotoxin-insensitive VAMP function blocks the chemoattractant axon extension to netrin-1 (Cotrufo et al., 2011). The authors propose a model where netrin-1 binding recruits syntaxin-1 to DCC, which then promotes the fusion of vesicles required for local membrane extension. Of greatest significance to the field, the interaction between DCC and syntaxin-1 provides a possible link between polarized membrane insertion and the established cytoskeletal rearrangements mediated by DCC. Netrins are multifunctional proteins. It is tempting to speculate that the findings presented in this article, along with past studies (Bouchard et al., 2004, 2008), indicate that different pools of vesicles regulate different aspects of the various responses made to netrin-1, in some cases influencing axon outgrowth and cell migration, and in others controlling axon arborization and the polarity of chemotropic turning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.037 | 0.057 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".