MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative morphology of dark-eyed juncos<i>Junco hyemalis</i>breeding at two elevations: a common aviary experiment

2008· article· en· W2065858564 on OpenAlexaffabout
Heather Bears, Mark C. Drever, Kathy Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Avian Biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

H. Bears (correspondence), M.C. Drever and K. Martin, Centre for Applied Conservation Research, University of British Columbia, 2424 MainMall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada. Present address of H. B.: Rescan Environmental Services, 1111 West Hastings,Vancouver, B.C., V6E 2J3, Canada. Email: bears@zoology.ubc.caMorphologies of bird species often vary along elevation gradients, yet causes of the variation have not been examinedexperimentally. We investigated variation in morphological traits of the dark-eyed junco Junco hyemalis, breeding at1,000 m a.s.l. (low-elevation; i.e. low) and 2,000 m asl (high-elevation; i.e. high) in the Rocky Mountains, Canada. Eightmorphological traits were measured in free-living birds. We found two consistent differences in populations betweenelevations: at high-elevation sites, females had longer wings and males had longer tails than birds from low- elevationsites. Other age- and gender- specific results were observed in free-living birds between elevations: tarsi were shorter inhigh-elevation second year (SY) females and after second year (ASY) males, beak lengths were slightly longer in low-elevation SY females, and high-elevation ASY females tended to have lower fat than low-elevation ASY females.Morphological differences may result from genetic differences between elevations, or phenotypic flexibility resulting fromexposure to the different environmental conditions. To identify which mechanism caused the difference inmorphometrics, hand-reared birds from low- and high-elevation habitats were raised in identical conditions withunlimited access to high quality food until they had replaced all feathers. The traits measured in the lab (wing and rectrixlength, weight and fat score) tended to increase in magnitude compared to field values. Juncos from high- and low-elevations had similar responses to the aviary environment, with one exception: males from high-elevation sites hadgreater weight gain relative to free-living juncos than males from low-elevation sites. Thus, morphological traits in dark-eyed juncos were phenotypically flexible, capable of growing larger in the laboratory environment. However, there werealso persistent genetic or perinatal/maternal differences underlying population responses that prevented traits fromconverging under aviary conditions. As a result, trait size differences between high- and low-elevation populations weremaintained or exacerbated in the common aviary environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Avian BiologySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207