Young porcine endocrine pancreatic islets cultured in fibrin show improved resistance toward hydrogen peroxide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To study the protective effect of a fibrin scaffold toward embedded young porcine endocrine pancreatic islets from hydrogen peroxide within the context of islet encapsulation in transplantation. METHODS: After isolation and in vitro maturation, groups of 200 young porcine islet equivalents (IEQ) were embedded in a 200 µL fibrin gel and exposed to 2 concentrations (10 and 100 µM) of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to investigate the ability of fibrin to protect islets against apoptotic stimuli. As a control, young porcine islets were seeded in tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) well plates and exposed to the same H2O2 concentrations. Islet integrity, viability and function were then investigated. RESULTS: Morphologically, the integrity of islets embedded in fibrin gels was better preserved compared with that of islets cultured in TCPS plates, when exposed to H2O2. Immunofluorescence staining showed that insulin and glucagon expression was higher in islets cultured in fibrin. Overall, H2O2 incubation led to decreased insulin and glucagon expression. A TUNEL assay revealed elevated numbers of apoptotic cells for islets cultured in TCPS plates when compared with those embedded in fibrin. Islets cultured in TCPS plates and exposed to H2O2 had diminished ability to secrete insulin in response to glucose stimulation, whereas islets embedded in fibrin maintained their glucose responsiveness. Insulin trapped in fibrin was extracted and quantified, revealing insulin in the extract. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Fibrin has a protective effect on young porcine endocrine pancreatic islets exposed to hydrogen peroxide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".