Observation of Liquid Crystals in Heavy Petroleum Fractions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we report for the first time the observation of naturally occurring discotic liquid-crystalline domains of ca. 100 μm in diameter in unreacted heavy fractions of petroleum. Precipitated solids from several bitumen and heavy oil samples exhibited the characteristic optical patterns of liquid crystals when observed under cross-polarized light. Samples included asphaltenes precipitated from Athabasca and Cold Lake bitumen (Canada), Maya heavy crude oil (Mexico), and Safaniya crude oil (Saudi Arabia) and a maltene fraction of Athabasca bitumen. The liquid-crystal domains appeared in asphaltene solids at ∼330 K in a nitrogen atmosphere and disappeared at ∼430 K. Upon cooling and subsequent reheating, the domains did not reappear. Liquid-crystal domains also appeared and then disappeared in the presence of toluene vapor at room temperature. Because the liquid crystals exhibit both thermotropic and lyotropic behavior, they are amphotropic. While amphotropic liquid crystals are known to arise in biological systems, the specific attributes of the liquid-crystal structures observed here are the first reported occurrence of such behavior in nature. The presence of liquid crystals in petroleum solids enriches our understanding of the complex phase and interfacial behavior of these materials and may provide new opportunities for partitioning petroleum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".