MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065935653 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v3n1p181

Synthesis of New Bioactive Sulfur Compounds Bearing Heterocyclic Moiety and Their Analytical Applications

2011· article· en· W2065935653 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammad S.T. Makki, Reda M. Abdel‐Rahman, M.S. El-Shahawi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Abdulaziz University
KeywordsChemistryMoietyFormic acidMercury (programming language)ThioureaHydrazideSulfurSorbentChloroacetic acidNuclear chemistryThiocyanateDetection limitOrganic chemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some new bioactive sulfur compounds bearing heterocyclic nitrogen moieties such as 3- imino–2-thioxo-4,5-dihydro- thiazolidin – 4-one (3), 3-imino – 2-thioxo -3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-1, 3-thiazine-4, 6- (2 H)dione(4), N- substituted – pyrazol -3,5-dione (10) , 1,3 –disubstituted -2-thioxo-pyrimidin-4,6 –dione (11) and di –(3,5-diaminopyrazolin-1-yl)thioketone (13) derived from dithioc formic acid hydrazide (1) and thiocarbohydrazide (7)were prepared via condensation of compound 1 or 7 with acyclic and cyclic oxo compounds (e.g. aldehydes andketones) in 1:1 and 1:2 molar ratios, and addition of iso thiocyanate or treatment with active methylene compoundsfollowed by ring closing reactions in different media (Schemes I & II). The biocidal effect of some compoundstowards some bacteria and fungi was evaluated. Compound 4 was used as selective chelating agent forspectrophotometric determination of mercury (II) ions. The limit of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) ofthe developed spectrophotometric method were found to be equal to 0.16 and 0.52 ?g mL-1 mercury (II),respectively. Compound 4 was also physically immobilized onto polyurethane foam (PUFs) and was successfullyused as solid sorbent in packed column for removal of mercury (II) ions from wastewater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207