The Efficacy of Femoral Nerve Block in Pain Reduction for Outpatient Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Double‐Blind, Prospective, Randomized Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of intraoperative femoral nerve block (FNB) in the reduction of postoperative pain following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) hamstring reconstruction. Patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft under general anesthetic who had signed an informed consent were included in the study. Patients were stratified to 4 surgeons and randomized to FNB with 0.25% bupivacaine or placebo of normal saline injected into the femoral nerve sheath before reversal of the general anesthetic. All patients received an intra-articular injection of bupivacaine at the beginning of their operative procedure. A single technique that included the use of a peripheral nerve stimulator was used for all FNBs. All patients were discharged on the day of surgery and given prescriptions for Tylenol 3. The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and a medication diary recording Tylenol 3 usage were completed by patients in the recovery room, on the night of surgery, and on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. There were complete data for 61 patients (FNB, 29; placebo, 32). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) test of the data showed no significant difference between the FNB and placebo group for pain reduction over the combined study period for both the SF-MPQ and VAS. However, the ANOVA does suggest that, on the night of surgery, there was a significant reduction in pain as measured with the VAS in the FNB group. A Student t test performed on the night of surgery data (SF-MPQ, P = .131; VAS, P = .0114; Tylenol 3, P = .076) showed a statistically significant difference between the FNB (39.4+/-21.0 mm) and placebo (56.8+/-24.6 mm) measured by VAS. Because this represented a difference of only 1.74 cm on a 10-cm VAS, it is unlikely to be clinically relevant. No difference was found in the amount of analgesic required on any day postoperatively. In conclusion, FNB may reduce pain on the night of surgery. However, this may not be clinically significant. FNB is not recommended at this time for use in outpatient ACL reconstruction with hamstring graft.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".