MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065974707 · doi:10.2118/125929-ms

Production Data Analysis of Fractured and Horizontal CBM Wells

2009· article· en· W2065974707 on OpenAlex
C. R. Clarkson, C. Jordan, D. Ilk, T. A. Blasingame

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Eastern Regional Meeting · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalbed methanePetroleum engineeringRelative permeabilityGeologyPermeability (electromagnetism)Two-phase flowMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Hydraulic fracturingDimensionless quantityReservoir simulationGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringPorosityCoalCoal miningChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In recent work, the authors (Clarkson et al 2008a; Clarkson et al 2007; Jordan et al 2006) demonstrated how modern production data analysis (PDA) methods, such as flowing material balance (FMB) and production type-curves, may be adapted to account for the unique reservoir characteristics of coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs through the appropriate use of material balance and time transforms. Reservoir characteristics related to storage and fluid flow that were addressed included: adsorbed and free-gas storage; single-phase flow of water above desorption pressure (undersaturated coals); 2-phase flow of gas and water below desorption pressure (saturated coals); non-static absolute permeability during depletion; and multi-layer behavior. Example (field) applications of the new PDA methods were limited to vertical wells that were either openhole completed, or slightly stimulated with hydraulic fracturing methods. In this work, new workflows and analytical approaches are provided for analyzing single- and multi-phase flow of CBM from vertical, hydraulically-fractured wells and horizontal wells. The workflow for single-phase CBM wells, which parallels that used in modern pressure transient analysis (well-testing), includes identification and analysis of flow regimes, followed by (model) type-curve matching and analytical (or numerical) modeling. Pseudotime is modified to account for instantaneous desorption. The analysis and methodology for 2-phase flow reservoirs is more complex, requiring additional modification of the pseudovariables to account for changes in effective permeability. A new workflow is introduced for 2-phase CBM wells that includes the transformation of the well production and flowing pressure data into dimensionless type-curve and flowing material balance coordinates using outputs from the simulator used to history-match the production data. Both simulated and field cases are analyzed to illustrate the new procedures and analytical techniques. The primary contribution of the current work is the demonstration that modern production analysis methods, modified for CBM reservoir behavior and combined with analytical (or numerical) modeling, can be used to extract quantitative reservoir information from CBM reservoirs which exhibit a wide-range in production characteristics, and completed in a variety of styles. The methods are expected to be used as a pre-cursor to or in parallel with reservoir simulation, to assist with CBM development decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it