Identification of Mitochondrial Complex I Assembly Intermediates by Tracing Tagged NDUFS3 Demonstrates the Entry Point of Mitochondrial Subunits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biogenesis of human mitochondrial complex I (CI) requires the coordinated assembly of 45 subunits derived from both the mitochondrial and nuclear genome. The presence of CI subcomplexes in CI-deficient cells suggests that assembly occurs in distinct steps. However, discriminating between products of assembly or instability is problematic. Using an inducible NDUFS3-green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression system in HEK293 cells, we here provide direct evidence for the stepwise assembly of CI. Upon induction, six distinct NDUFS3-GFP-containing subcomplexes gradually appeared on a blue native Western blot also observed in wild type HEK293 mitochondria. Their stability was demonstrated by differential solubilization and heat incubation, which additionally allowed their distinction from specific products of CI instability and breakdown. Inhibition of mitochondrial translation under conditions of steady state labeling resulted in an accumulation of two of the NDUFS3-GFP-containing subcomplexes (100 and 150 kDa) and concomitant disappearance of the fully assembled complex. Lifting inhibition reversed this effect, demonstrating that these two subcomplexes are true assembly intermediates. Composition analysis showed that this event was accompanied by the incorporation of at least one mitochondrial DNA-encoded subunit, thereby revealing the first entry point of these subunits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".