Correlation Analysis of Capillary APOE, VEGF and eNOS Expression in Alzheimer Brains
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vasoactive regulatory and transport proteins can modify the transendothelial blood-brain barrier (BBB) transport of beta-amyloid. Dysfunction of one or more of these proteins is hypothesized to contribute to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study we investigated superior temporal and occipital cortical sections from ten AD and ten control group brains (CG). They were examined using immunohistochemical techniques staining for β(42) amyloid, APOE, VEGF and eNOS. The densities of senile plaques (SPs) and APOE, VEGF and eNOS positive capillaries in each region and in each AD and CG condition were compared using nonparametric statistical analysis. In the AD cases, there were significant negative correlations between APOE positive capillaries and β(42) amyloid SPs, and positive correlations between APOE positive capillaries and VEGF and eNOS positive capillaries. These results demonstrate the increased presence of APOE activity in AD brain capillaries, and that there is a positive correlation between the expression of APOE and each of VEGF and eNOS in the capillaries of AD brains. It is possible, therefore, that the down regulation of APOE in AD brains may contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of SP lesion development by modulating brain β-amyloid burden. The specific interrelationship between APOE, VEGF and eNOS activity at the BBB requires further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it