MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065999936 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.30190

Sequence variation in the 3′‐untranslated region of the dopamine transporter gene and attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

2005· article· en· W2065999936 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Feng, Karen Wigg, Rohit Makkar, Abel Ickowicz, Tejaswee Pathare, Rosemary Tannock, Wendy Roberts, Molly Malone, James L. Kennedy, Russell Schachar, Cathy L. Barr

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDopamine transporterGeneticsVariable number tandem repeatAlleleAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderGenotypingUntranslated regionPolymorphism (computer science)BiologyGeneGenotypeMedicinePsychiatryTransporterMessenger RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) has been reported to be associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a number of studies [Cook et al. (1995): Am J Human Genet 56(4):9993-998; Gill et al. (1997): Mol Psychiatry 2(4):311-313; Waldman et al. (1998): Am J Human Genet 63(6):1767-1776; Barr et al. (2001): Biol Psychiatry 49(4):333-339; Curran et al. (2001): Mol Psychiatry 6(4):425-428; Chen et al. (2003): Mol Psychiatry 8(4):393-396]. Specifically, the 10-repeat allele of the 40-bp variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism located in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of the gene has been found to be associated with ADHD. There is evidence from in vitro studies indicating that variability in the repeat number, and sequence variation in the 3'-UTR of the DAT1 gene may influence the level of the dopamine transporter protein [Fuke et al. (2001): Pharmacogenomics J 1(2):152-156; Miller and Madras (2002): Mol Psychiatry 7(1):44-55]. In this study, we investigated whether DNA variation in the DAT1 3'UTR contributed to ADHD by genotyping DNA variants around the VNTR region in a sample of 178 ADHD families. These included a MspI polymorphism (rs27072), a DraI DNA change (T/C) reported to influence DAT1 expression levels, and a BstUI polymorphism (rs3863145) in addition to the VNTR. We also screened the VNTR region by direct resequencing to determine if there was sequence variation within the repeat units that could account for the association. Our results indicate that DAT1 is associated with ADHD in our sample but not with alleles of the VNTR polymorphism. We did not find any variation in the sequence for either the 10- or 9-repeat alleles in the probands screened nor did we observe the reported DraI (T/C) variation. Our results therefore refute the possibility of the reported DraI variation or alleles of the VNTR as the functional variants contributing to the disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric GeneticsSame topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFrench-language works237,207