MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066032974 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2012.04.0242

Identification of Mycosphaerella Blight Resistance in Wild <i>Pisum</i> Species for Use in Pea Breeding

2012· article· en· W2066032974 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ambuj Bhushan Jha, Thomas D. Warkentin, V. Gurusamy, Bunyamin Tar’an, Sabine Banniza

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetic and Environmental Crop Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersSaskatchewan Pulse GrowersUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsBiologySativumPisumMycosphaerellaBlightGermplasmPlant disease resistanceField peaBotanyIntrogressionCultivarSubspeciesHorticultureGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Mycosphaerella blight caused by Mycosphaerella pinodes (Berk. and Blox.) Vestergren is the most important disease of pea ( Pisum sativum L.) in the world. It reduces seed yield and quality and limits the areas where field pea can effectively be grown. Extensive studies have failed to identify high levels of resistance. However, some accessions of Pisum fulvum Sm., a wild relative of field pea, may be a source of new resistance genes. The objective of this study was to identify mycosphaerella blight‐resistant wild pea accessions for use in introgression breeding in Canada. Twenty‐six P . fulvum accessions and 18 accessions of wild subspecies of P. sativum {subsp. elatius (Steven ex M. Bieb.) Asch. &amp; Graebn., subsp. transcaucasicum Govorov, subsp. asiaticum Govorov, subsp. sativum var. arvense (L.) Poir., and Pisum abyssinicum A. Braun [syn. P. sativum subsp. abyssinicum (A. Braun) Govorov]} were evaluated along with the check cultivars CDC Striker (moderate resistance) and Alfetta (poor resistance). Among the 44 wild accessions tested under greenhouse condition, 12 accessions had significantly lower disease scores than CDC Striker ( P &lt; 0.0001). The 18 most promising accessions along with checks including ‘Radley’ (moderate resistance), CDC Striker, and Alfetta were evaluated for disease resistance under field conditions. None of these accessions had significantly lower disease scores than Radley and CDC Striker. Pisum fulvum accessions PI595937, P651, W615017, and PI560061 and P . sativum subsp. elatius accession PI344538 were considered the most promising for resistance breeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrop ScienceSame topicGenetic and Environmental Crop StudiesFrench-language works237,207