CD34‐positive acute promyelocytic leukemia is associated with leukocytosis, microgranular/hypogranular morphology, expression of CD2 and bcr3 isoform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has a favorable prognosis. Current therapy includes chemotherapy used in combination with all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA). Although the differentiating effects of ATRA on promyelocytes have been well established, in vitro studies have shown that less-differentiated APL blasts (CD34(+)) demonstrate a variable responsiveness to ATRA. To assess the clinical relevance of this finding, we analyzed a cohort of 38 patients with t(15;17) and/or PML-RARalpha APL to determine the incidence and laboratory features of CD34(+) APL. Thirty-two percent (12/38) of cases were CD34(+). There was a difference in WBC at presentation between CD34(+) and CD34(-) cases (34.6 +/- 9.2, mean +/- standard error vs. 5.4 +/- 2.0, P = 0.009). Patients with CD34(+) APL demonstrated a micro/hypogranular phenotype (75%) (P = 0.001), co-expression of CD2(+) (83%) (P = 0.001), and the bcr3 isoform (100%) (P = 0.017). In contrast, CD34(-) cases demonstrated hypergranular morphology (65%), CD2(+) (15%), and the bcr1 isoform (50%). A high presenting WBC count (\G10 x 10(9)/L) was associated with an inferior overall survival (Log rank = 0.0047). Patients with CD34(+) APL demonstrated an incidence of early mortality of 50%. Despite a marked correlation between CD34 positivity and increased WBC count, overall survival of CD34(+) and CD34(-) cases did not differ significantly in our small cohort. Immunophenotypic analysis for CD34 expression should be included in future large APL trials to determine if detection of CD34(+) blasts represents an independent adverse prognostic factor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".