MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066072362 · doi:10.2118/170144-ms

Practical Implementation of Knowledge-Based Approaches for SAGD Production Analysis

2014· article· en· W2066072362 on OpenAlex
Zhiwei Ma, Juliana Y. Leung, Stefan Zanon, Peter Dzurman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial neural networkData miningReservoir simulationProcess (computing)Set (abstract data type)Production (economics)Variable (mathematics)Machine learningArtificial intelligencePetroleum engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Quantitative appraisal of different operating areas and assessment of uncertainty due to reservoir heterogeneities are crucial elements in optimization of production and development strategies in oil sands operations. Although detailed compositional simulators are available for recovery performance evaluation for SAGD, the simulation process is usually deterministic and computationally demanding, and it not quite practical for real-time decision-making and forecasting. Data mining and machine learning algorithms provide efficient modeling alternatives, particularly when the underlying physical relationships between system variables are highly complex, non-linear, and possibly uncertain. In this study, a comprehensive training set encompassing SAGD field data compiled from numerous publicly-available sources is studied. Exploratory data analysis is carried out to interpret and extract relevant attributes describing characteristics associated with reservoir heterogeneities and operating constraints. Because of their ease of implementation and computational efficiency, knowledge-based techniques including artificial neural networks (ANN) are employed to facilitate SAGD production performance prediction. Predicting (input) variables including porosity, net-to-gross ratio, saturation, gross pay, normalized shale barrier thickness and distance to well pair, and initial production rate are formulated. Measures such as cumulative production over discrete time intervals are considered as prediction (output) variables. Data records that are comprised of both input and output variables are assembled; the network is trained using the data set to identify all significant patterns and relationships that exist between the input and the output variables. The model is subsequently validated using a cross-verification procedure, during which records that have been excluded at the training stage are presented to the model. This paper demonstrates that knowledge-based techniques can be implemented in a practical manner to analyze large amount of competitor data efficiently. The approach can be integrated directly into most existing reservoir management routines. It can also be readily updated when new information has become available. Given that robust reservoir management and real-time decision-making are major challenges faced by the industry, the data-driven models presented in this paper has great potential to be applied in other recovery projects such as solvent-aided steam injection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.724

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it