Fracture Toughness Evaluation of High Strength Steel Pipe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stress fields and constraint parameters (Q and A2) of circumferentially-cracked high strength pipe in displacement-controlled tension are compared with those of small-scale single-edge notched samples tested in tension (SE(T)) and bending (SE(B)). The factors affecting transferability of fracture toughness (J-resistance) data from small-scale laboratory tests to cracked high strength pipe are discussed. The crack-tip stress field is of similar form for a circumferential crack in a pipe and a SE(T) test specimen, while for a SE(B) specimen there is a significant gradient in the crack-tip stress field. Hence, the fracture toughness can be characterized by only two parameters (J and Q or J and A2) for tension-loaded pipe and SE(T) tests, but for SE(B) tests one more parameter is needed to describe the bending term. It is concluded that the constraint in a SE(T) test with ratio of span between load points to width H/W = 10 provides a reasonable match to that for a circumferential crack in a pipe subjected to tensile loading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".