Discovery of the Low‐Redshift Optical Afterglow of GRB 011121 and Its Progenitor Supernova SN 2001ke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the discovery and follow-up observations of the afterglow of the GRB 011121 and its associated supernova SN 2001ke. Images were obtained with the OGLE 1.3m telescope in BVRI passbands, starting 10.3 hours after the burst. The temporal analysis of our early data indicates a steep decay, independent of wavelength with power-law index alpha=-1.72+/-0.05. There is no evidence for a break in the light curve earlier than 2.5 days after the burst. The spectral energy distribution determined from the early broad-band photometry is a power-law with index beta=-0.66+/-0.13 after correcting for a large reddening. Spectra, obtained with the Magellan 6.5m Baade telescope, reveal narrow emission lines from the host galaxy which provide a redshift of z=0.362+/-0.001 to the GRB. We also present late R and J-band observations of the afterglow between 7-17 days after the burst. The late-time photometry shows a large deviation from the initial decline and our data combined with Hubble Space Telescope photometry provide strong evidence for a supernova peaking about 12 rest-frame days after the GRB. The first spectrum ever obtained of a GRB supernova at cosmological distance revealed a blue continuum. SN 2001ke was more blue near maximum than SN 1998bw and faded more quickly which demonstrates that a range of properties are possible in supernovae which generate GRB. The blue color is consistent with a supernova interacting with circumstellar gas and this progenitor wind is also evident in the optical afterglow. This is the best evidence to date that classical, long gamma-ray bursts are generated by core-collapse supernovae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".