MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experimentally Reduced Perfusion of One Eye Impairs Retinal Function in Both Eyes

2005· article· en· W2066174485 on OpenAlexafffund
John V. Lovasik, Hélène Kergoat, Marc Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueOptometry and Vision Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsAssociation for Canadian StudiesUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOphthalmologyIntraocular pressureMedicineScotopic visionElectroretinographyPerfusionRetinalCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The oscillatory potential index of scotopic white flash electroretinograms is reversibly enhanced in the contralateral eye when the ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) to the test eye is transiently reduced. A transient increase in the intraocular pressure (IOP) and decrease in the OPP in the test eye induced quantifiable vascular changes in the optic nerve head of the contralateral eye. We explored this contralateral phenomenon looking at ganglion cell function in both eyes during elevated IOP and decreased OPP in the test eye only. Our specific objective was to characterize the effects that transient hypoperfusion had on the neural generators of the pattern-reversal electroretinograms (pERGs), the ganglion cells, and preganglion neurons. METHODS: A transient elevation in the IOP was sustained in 10 healthy subjects by scleral suction to reduce the baseline OPP by 15, 30, 45, and 60% for 2-min intervals. For each level of OPP, pERGs were evoked by a checkerboard with 75 minarc high-contrast black-white checks reversing at 5 Hz and recorded bilaterally using DTL fiber electrodes. The pERGs were also recorded immediately after removal of scleral suction and at 2-min intervals thereafter for an 8-min recovery interval. RESULTS: The unilateral decrease in OPP differentially reduced the pERG in the test and contralateral eyes. The pERG for the test eye returned to baseline amplitude within 2 min of removing the suction cup. In contrast, the pERG in the contralateral eye remained below baseline throughout the entire 8-min recovery interval. CONCLUSIONS: The observation of a bilateral decrease in the pERGs while the OPP was decreased in the test eye only suggested that these neuronal changes were modified at more central visual centers for retinal function to be compromised bilaterally. This latter effect may have been mediated by the transiently altered OPP or yet unknown neurohormonal mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptometry and Vision ScienceSame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207