An Open-Label, Long-Term Safety and Tolerability Trial of Diclofenac Sodium 1% Gel in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of topical diclofenac sodium 1% gel (DSG) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) for up to 12 months. METHODS: This was a multicenter open-label, extension of two 3-month, randomized, double-blind studies of DSG in patients with knee OA (NCT ID: NCT00171691, "Safety of Diclofenac Sodium Gel in Knee Osteoarthritis"). To ensure adequate enrollment, some DSG-naïve patients with OA who had not participated in the double-blind studies were also enrolled. Patients applied 4 g DSG to 1 or both knees 4 times daily for 9 to 12 months. Safety was evaluated through adverse event (AE) reporting, physical examination, and laboratory investigations. Patients completed the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, stiffness, and physical function scales every 3 months to assess long-term effectiveness. RESULTS: The extension study enrolled 583 patients; 294 patients completed the study. Use of DSG was documented for 578 patients (safety population). The mean age was 62.3 years, and 63.7% of patients were women. Overall, 112 (19.4%) patients reported ≥ 1 treatment-related AE, and the only treatment-related AE occurring in ≥ 1% of patients was application-site dermatitis. Treatment-related gastrointestinal, renal-function, hepatic-function, and cardiovascular AEs were reported by 3, 1, 2, and 0 patients, respectively. There were no serious AEs or deaths. At 1 year, improvements from baseline for WOMAC pain, stiffness, and physical function scale scores were 39.8%, 33.4%, and 36.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The long-term safety profile of DSG was consistent with previous 12-week studies, and DSG remained effective for a 1-year period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".