MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066216913 · doi:10.1021/bi051580l

The Role of Electrostatics in the Interaction of the Inhibitory Region of Troponin I with Troponin C

2005· article· en· W2066216913 on OpenAlexafffund
Darrin A. Lindhout, Robert F. Boyko, David C. Corson, Monica X. Li, Brian D. Sykes

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTroponin ITroponin complexTroponinChemistryTroponin TElectrostaticsTroponin CBiophysicsTernary complexCrystallographyBiochemistryBiologyCardiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have addressed the electrostatic interactions occurring between the inhibitory region of cardiac troponin I with the C-lobe of troponin C using scanning glycine mutagenesis of the inhibitory region. We report variations in the electric potentials due to mutation of charged residues within this complex based upon the solved NMR structure (1OZS). These results demonstrate the importance of electrostatics within this complex, and it is proposed that electrostatic interactions are integral to the formation and function of larger ternary troponin complexes. To address this hypothesis, we report (15)N NMR relaxation measurements, which suggest that, within a ternary complex involving the C-lobe and the N-terminal region of troponin I (residues 34-71), the inhibitory region maintains the electrostatic interactions with the E-helix of the C-lobe as observed within the binary complex. These results imply that, in solution, the cardiac troponin complex behaves in a manner consistent with that of the crystal structure of the skeletal isoform (1YTZ). A cardiac troponin complex possessing domain orientations similar to that of the skeletal isoform provides structural insights into altered troponin I activities as observed for the familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation R144G and phosphorylation of Thr142.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207