MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066221262 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m307826200

Solution Structure of the Dimeric Zinc Binding Domain of the Chaperone ClpX

2003· article· en· W2066221262 on OpenAlexafffund
Logan W. Donaldson, Urszula Wojtyra, Walid A. Houry

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoYork University
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsChaperone (clinical)ZincChemistryBiophysicsBinding domainProtein structureCrystallographyCell biologyComputational biologyBiochemistryBinding siteBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ClpX (423 amino acids), a member of the Clp/Hsp100 family of molecular chaperones and the protease, ClpP, comprise a multimeric complex supporting targeted protein degradation in Escherichia coli. The ClpX sequence consists of an NH2-terminal zinc binding domain (ZBD) and a COOH-terminal ATPase domain. Earlier, we have demonstrated that the zinc binding domain forms a constitutive dimer that is essential for the degradation of some ClpX substrates such as gammaO and MuA but is not required for the degradation of other substrates such as green fluorescent protein-SsrA. In this report, we present the NMR solution structure of the zinc binding domain dimer. The monomer fold reveals that ZBD is a member of the treble clef zinc finger family, a motif known to facilitate protein-ligand, protein-DNA, and protein-protein interactions. However, the dimeric ZBD structure is not related to any protein structure in the Protein Data Bank. A trimer-of-dimers model of ZBD is presented, which might reflect the closed state of the ClpX hexamer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207