MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066241212 · doi:10.1002/jcu.10131

Effect of transvaginal sonography on the use of invasive procedures for evaluating patients with a clinical diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy

2002· article· en· W2066241212 on OpenAlexaff
Mostafa Atri, David Valenti, P M Bret, Peter Gillett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Ultrasound · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEctopic pregnancyDemographicsTransvaginal sonographyRetrospective cohort studyCurettageMedical recordMissed abortionPresentation (obstetrics)PregnancyLaparoscopyObstetricsSurgeryRadiologyAbortion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine the effect of transvaginal sonography (TVS) on the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy (EP). Specifically, we wished to determine what effect TVS had on the use of invasive procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the medical records of 290 patients with a surgically documented diagnosis of EP. It included 147 consecutive patients from the era of use of suprapubic sonography (SPS) (1982-1987) and 143 consecutive patients from the era of use of TVS (1987-1995). We compared the percentages of patients who had undergone sonographic examinations, the rates of use of the invasive procedures dilatation and curettage (D&C) and diagnostic laparoscopy (DL), time from presentation to diagnosis, necessity for transfusion, status of EP at surgery, and various other characteristics of the patients (eg, demographics, serum level of beta human chorionic gonadotropin, and presenting symptoms). RESULTS: In the SPS era, 46.9% of the patients had undergone sonography, compared with 78.3% in the TVS era (p = 0.001). Sonographic sensitivity was 60.9% in the SPS era and 93.8% in the TVS era (p = 0.001). D&C was performed in 53.1% and DL in 76.2% of patients in the SPS era, compared with 14.0% and 30.8%, respectively, in the TVS era (p = 0.001). In the last full year of the study, only 9% of the patients had undergone D&C and 9%, DL. The overall time from presentation to diagnosis significantly decreased from 45.6 hours in the SPS era to 16.8 hours in the TVS era (p = 0.002). We found no significant difference between the 2 eras in the need for transfusion and the percentage of ruptured EPs at surgery (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of TVS has had an important effect on the evaluation of patients with EP by nearly eliminating the need for D&C and DL and permitting clinicians to take a more conservative approach to managing EP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical UltrasoundSame topicEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207