MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066241212 · doi:10.1002/jcu.10131

Effect of transvaginal sonography on the use of invasive procedures for evaluating patients with a clinical diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy

2002· article· en· W2066241212 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Ultrasound · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEctopic pregnancyDemographicsTransvaginal sonographyRetrospective cohort studyCurettageMedical recordMissed abortionPresentation (obstetrics)PregnancyLaparoscopyObstetricsSurgeryRadiologyAbortion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine the effect of transvaginal sonography (TVS) on the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy (EP). Specifically, we wished to determine what effect TVS had on the use of invasive procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the medical records of 290 patients with a surgically documented diagnosis of EP. It included 147 consecutive patients from the era of use of suprapubic sonography (SPS) (1982-1987) and 143 consecutive patients from the era of use of TVS (1987-1995). We compared the percentages of patients who had undergone sonographic examinations, the rates of use of the invasive procedures dilatation and curettage (D&C) and diagnostic laparoscopy (DL), time from presentation to diagnosis, necessity for transfusion, status of EP at surgery, and various other characteristics of the patients (eg, demographics, serum level of beta human chorionic gonadotropin, and presenting symptoms). RESULTS: In the SPS era, 46.9% of the patients had undergone sonography, compared with 78.3% in the TVS era (p = 0.001). Sonographic sensitivity was 60.9% in the SPS era and 93.8% in the TVS era (p = 0.001). D&C was performed in 53.1% and DL in 76.2% of patients in the SPS era, compared with 14.0% and 30.8%, respectively, in the TVS era (p = 0.001). In the last full year of the study, only 9% of the patients had undergone D&C and 9%, DL. The overall time from presentation to diagnosis significantly decreased from 45.6 hours in the SPS era to 16.8 hours in the TVS era (p = 0.002). We found no significant difference between the 2 eras in the need for transfusion and the percentage of ruptured EPs at surgery (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of TVS has had an important effect on the evaluation of patients with EP by nearly eliminating the need for D&C and DL and permitting clinicians to take a more conservative approach to managing EP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it