MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066277575 · doi:10.1029/2007gl030283

Crustal uplift and sea level rise in northern Cascadia from GPS, absolute gravity, and tide gauge data

2007· article· en· W2066277575 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsGeodesyTide gaugeGeologyGlobal Positioning SystemSolid earthOffset (computer science)Reference frameSea levelSeismologyOceanographyGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We combine data from nine GPS, absolute gravity, and tide gauge stations to estimate the relation between sea‐level rise, vertical motion, and solid Earth processes in the Pacific Northwest. GPS vertical velocities (in ITRF2000) and absolute gravity rates are well correlated, with a gradient of 0.2 ± 0.1 μ Gal mm −1 , but show a significant offset of 0.53 ± 0.30 μ Gal yr −1 (2.2 ± 1.3 mm yr −1 ) (95% confidence). Tide gauge and GPS data indicate a northeast Pacific regional sea‐level rise of 1.7 ± 0.5 mm yr −1 , aligned to ITRF2000, or an unlikely regional sea‐level fall of −0.5 ± 0.5 mm yr −1 , aligned to absolute gravity. Although we cannot rule out a bias in the GPS reference‐frame alignment, our results suggest a possible absolute gravity bias by a long‐period mass increase from an unknown near‐surface or deep‐seated source. The impact of such a mass increase on gravity, vertical motion, and sea level remains to be defined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it