MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066294172 · doi:10.1139/w03-028

Nitrate reductase from the magnetotactic bacterium<i>Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum</i>MS-1: purification and sequence analyses

2003· article· en· W2066294172 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Azuma Taoka, Katsuhiko Yoshimatsu, Masaaki Kanemori, Yoshihiro Fukumori

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrate reductaseBiologyNitrite reductaseEscherichia coliBiochemistryPeriplasmic spaceHemeReductaseProteobacteriaNAPAMolecular biologyGeneEnzyme16S ribosomal RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We purified the nitrate reductase from the soluble fraction of Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum MS-1. The enzyme was composed of 86- and 17-kDa subunits and contained molybdenum, non-heme iron, and heme c. These properties are very similar to those of the periplasmic nitrate reductase found in Paracoccus pantotrophus. The M. magnetotacticum nap locus was clustered in seven open reading frames, napFDAGHBC. The phylogenetic analyses of NapA, NapB, and NapC suggested a close relationship between M. magnetotacticum nap genes and Escherichia coli nap genes, which is not consistent with the 16S rDNA data. This is the first finding that the alpha subclass of Proteobacteria possesses a napFDAGHBC-type nap gene cluster. The nap gene cluster had putative fumarate and nitrate reduction regulatory protein (Fnr) and NarL protein binding sites. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of molybdate deficiency in medium on the total iron content of the magnetosome fraction and discussed the physiological function of nitrate reductase in relation to the magnetite synthesis in M. magnetotacticum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207