MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066310049 · doi:10.1139/z02-223

Genetic homogeneity of Canadian mainland marten populations underscores the distinctiveness of Newfoundland pine martens (<i>Martes americana atrata</i>)

2003· article· en· W2066310049 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Christopher J. Kyle, Curtis Strobeck

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMartenBiological dispersalEcologyBiologyGene flowGenetic structureTaigaPopulationTransectHabitatBorealZoologyGenetic variationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

American pine martens (Martes americana) are mid-sized mustelids found in the boreal and taiga zones of North America that prefer late-successional coniferous forests. Studies have shown that tracts of treeless land and roads may impede marten dispersal and that fewer martens are captured or observed in clear-cut areas. If marten habitat is indeed fragmented by roads and treeless land, this may result in decreased gene flow between regions and therefore in increased levels of genetic structure and decreased genetic variation in regions where these potential barriers are present. In this study, we evaluate the genetic variation and connectivity of marten populations across Canada. Thirty-five regions from the Canadian provinces and territories were sampled, including 1262 individuals, genotyped at 11 microsatellite loci. As expected, and in agreement with previous studies, little genetic structure was observed in northern regions, where few barriers to marten dispersal are thought to exist. However, contrary to our expectations, no strong breaks in gene flow were observed between any of the 35 sampled regions with the exception of the insular Newfoundland population. The lack of genetic structure observed may suggest that, at a larger scale, marten dispersal is not as limited by some landscape features as was previously thought.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207