<i>In Vitro</i> Cartilage Tissue Formation by Co-culture of Primary and Passaged Chondrocytes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Passaging chondrocytes to increase cell number is one way to overcome the major limitation to cartilage tissue engineering, which is obtaining sufficient numbers of chondrocytes to form large amounts of tissue. Because neighboring cells can influence cell phenotype and because passaging induces dedifferentiation, we examined whether coculture of primary and passaged bovine articular chondrocytes in 3-dimensional culture would form cartilage tissue in vitro. Chondrocytes passaged in monolayer culture up to 4 times were mixed with primary (nonpassaged) chondrocytes (5-40% of total cell number) and grown on filter inserts for up to 4 weeks. Passaged cells alone did not form cartilage, but with the addition of increasing numbers of primary chondrocytes, up to 20%, there was an increase in cartilage tissue formation as determined histologically and biochemically and demonstrated by increasing proteoglycan and collagen accumulation. The passaged cells appeared to be undergoing redifferentiation, as indicated by up-regulation of aggrecan, type II collagen, and SOX9 gene expression and decreased type I collagen expression. This switch in collagen type was confirmed using Western blots. Confocal microscopy showed that fluorescently labeled primary cells were distributed throughout the tissue. This coculture approach could provide a new way to solve the problem of limited cell number for cartilage tissue engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it