Simultaneous Heat and Mass Transfer in Inclined Channel With Asymmetrical Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work deals with a numerical study of simultaneous heat and mass transfer with phase change in an inclined channel formed by two parallel plates. The lower one is covered by a thin liquid water film and the upper one is considered impermeable. The plates are maintained at a constant temperature TW. Ambient air with uniform dry bulb temperature Tin and relative humidity φin enters the channel with a uniform upward velocity Uin. The liquid film is assumed to be extremely thin and its temperature is equal to the wall temperature. Steady state conditions are considered and the flow is assumed to be laminar. Viscous dissipation, radiation heat transfer and other secondary effects (pressure work, energy transport by the inter-diffusion of species, Dufour and Soret effects) are neglected. The physical properties are taken constant except for the density in the body forces, which is considered to be a linear function of temperature and mass fraction. Results show that buoyancy forces have an important effect on the hydrodynamic, thermal and mass fraction fields and this effect depends on the channel inclination. A flow reversal chart and analytical correlations for the corresponding critical values of the thermal and solutal Grashof numbers are presented for different channel inclinations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".