MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066356555 · doi:10.2341/11-501-l

Effect of Chlorhexidine Application on the Long-term Shear Bond Strength to Dentin of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer

2012· article· en· W2066356555 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOperative Dentistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental materials and restorations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlass ionomer cementChlorhexidineDentinAdhesiveBond strengthDentistryChemistryDental bondingNuclear chemistryMaterials scienceComposite materialMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) application on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to polyalkenoic acid-preconditioned dentin after 24 hours, six months, and 12 months of water storage at 37°C. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cylindrical molds, placed on flat, polyalkenoic acid (Cavity Conditioner® [GC]) preconditioned dentin surfaces of 90 human teeth embedded in resin, were filled with Fuji II LC® (GC), a RMGIC, with (n=45) or without (n=45) the prior application of a 0.05% CHX solution. Within each group, SBS was determined after 24 hours (n=15), six months (n=15), and 12 months (n=15) of storage in water at 37°C. The results were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey multiple means comparisons (p<0.05). The type of bond failure (adhesive/cohesive/mixed) was noted and the results were analyzed with chi-square test (p<0.05). RESULTS: After 24 hours, the SBS of RMGIC was not significantly different with (9.0 ± 2.8 MPa) or without (8.3±0.6 MPa) the application of CHX. After six months, however, SBS increased significantly in the group without CHX (12.7±3.4 MPa) but remained unchanged in the CHX group (9.4±4.0 MPa). Similar results without CHX (12.6±3.8 MPa) and with CHX (9.5±3.2 MPa) were obtained after 12 months. No significant differences in the type of debonding were found between the various groups tested. CONCLUSION: The application of 0.05% CHX after dentin preconditioning did not seem to have affected the 24-hour SBS of RMGIC. However, the six- and 12-month SBS was significantly lower for CHX-treated samples, possibly as a result of CHX interference with both the bonding mechanism and the maturation reaction of RMGIC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it