Equilibrium of Multi-Phase Systems in Gravitational Fields
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four necessary conditions for equilibrium of an isolated solid-liquid-vapor system in a gravitational field were derived by Ward and Sasges (1998) in a unified setting, by using an entropy maximization approach, and under the assumption that the liquid-vapor surface tension does not depend on elevation. These are thermal equilibrium, the Laplace and Young equations, and a condition on the chemical potentials of the components present in the system. Gibbs (1876) had obtained the Young equation in a derivation separate from the derivation of the other three conditions and by using an energy minimization approach. However, Gibbs had derived a more general form of the Laplace equation than Ward and Sasges's. Gibbs's equation contained a term expressing the contribution of the variation of surface tension with elevation. This equation has since been neglected by most of the scientific community. In the present paper, the same approach as Ward and Sasges's is used to derive, in an unified setting, the conditions for equilibrium of an isolated solid-liquid-vapor system in a gravitational field but under the assumption that the liquid-vapor surface tension may depend on elevation. The four well-known conditions for equilibrium are obtained, with Gibbs's generalized Laplace equation instead of the classical Laplace equation. The derivations in this paper were carried out for two different system geometries, namely, for a sessile drop and for a conical capillary tube, and similar conditions for equilibrium were obtained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".