Relation between in vivo and in vitro measurements of skeletal muscle oxidative metabolism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relationships between in vivo (31)P magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and in vitro markers of oxidative capacity (mitochondrial function) were determined in 27 women with varying levels of physical fitness. Following 90-s isometric plantar flexion exercises, calf muscle mitochondrial function was determined from the phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery time constant, the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) recovery time constant, the rate of change of PCr during the initial 14 s of recovery, and the apparent maximum rate of oxidative adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis (Q(max)). Muscle fiber type distribution (I, IIa, IIx), citrate synthase (CS) activity, and cytochrome c oxidase (COX) activity were determined from a biopsy sample of lateral gastrocnemius. MRS markers of mitochondrial function correlated moderately (P < 0.05) with the percentage of type IIa oxidative fibers (r = 0.41 to 0.66) and CS activity (r = 0.48 to 0.64), but only weakly with COX activity (r = 0.03 to 0.26, P > 0.05). These results support the use of MRS to determine mitochondrial function in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".