MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066476389 · doi:10.2113/gsjfr.39.4.335

EARLY EVOLUTION OF THE CRETACEOUS SERIAL PLANKTIC FORAMINIFERA (LATE ALBIAN-CENOMANIAN)

2009· article· en· W2066476389 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. D. Georgescu, Brigitte Huber

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Foraminiferal Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversità degli Studi di Milano
KeywordsForaminiferaCitationIconCenomanianCretaceousGeologyPaleontologyHistoryArt historyLibrary scienceOceanographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| October 01, 2009 EARLY EVOLUTION OF THE CRETACEOUS SERIAL PLANKTIC FORAMINIFERA (LATE ALBIAN–CENOMANIAN) Marius D. Georgescu; Marius D. Georgescu 3 1Geoscience, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N. W., Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada 3Correspondence author. E-mail: dgeorge@ucalgary.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Brian T. Huber Brian T. Huber 2Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 10th and Constitution Ave., Washington D.C., 20013-7012, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Marius D. Georgescu 3 1Geoscience, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N. W., Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada Brian T. Huber 2Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 10th and Constitution Ave., Washington D.C., 20013-7012, USA 3Correspondence author. E-mail: dgeorge@ucalgary.ca Publisher: Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research Received: 20 Jan 2009 Accepted: 23 Jul 2009 First Online: 03 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-264X Print ISSN: 0096-1191 © 2009 Journal of Foraminiferal Research Journal of Foraminiferal Research (2009) 39 (4): 335–360. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.39.4.335 Article history Received: 20 Jan 2009 Accepted: 23 Jul 2009 First Online: 03 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Marius D. Georgescu, Brian T. Huber; EARLY EVOLUTION OF THE CRETACEOUS SERIAL PLANKTIC FORAMINIFERA (LATE ALBIAN–CENOMANIAN). Journal of Foraminiferal Research 2009;; 39 (4): 335–360. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.39.4.335 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyJournal of Foraminiferal Research Search Advanced Search Abstract The classification of the late Albian–Cenomanian biserial planktic foraminiferal family Heterohelicidae Cushman, 1927, is reevaluated. This group underwent a period of relatively slow evolutionary change during the late Albian–early Cenomanian followed by rapid evolution in the middle Cenomanian. Three new heterohelicid genera and species in the late Albian–early Turonian are described: Protoheterohelix obscura, Planoheterohelix postmoremani, and Globoheterohelix paraglobulosa. Two reassigned species are also emended: Protoheterohelix washitensis (Tappan) and Planoheterohelix moremani (Cushman). Reassessment of the taxonomic significance of morphological features of the heterohelicid test leads to the conclusion that the most important characters in their taxonomy are test architecture, symmetry/asymmetry of the periapertural structures, nature of periapertural structures, relative size difference of the proloculus and second chamber, test ornamentation, and pore size. Most heterohelicid taxa of the late Albian–Cenomanian display microperforate test walls. HeterohelixEhrenberg, 1843, which evolved in the early Turonian, is a distinct lineage. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Foraminiferal ResearchSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207